Search results for: 'Pillow+v'
- Related search terms
- pillow+vacuum
- M-1004 SPECIAL SEWING MACHINE FOR CLOSING PILLOWS AND CUSHIONSFOR CLOSING PILLOWS AND CUSHIONS (IN FEATHER, BALL FIBER, RECYCLED FIBER AND SIMILAR) THIS MACHINE IS SPECIFIC FOR THE CLOSING OF ROLOFIL CUSHIONS, FEATHER PILLOWS, CARDED CUSHIONS, CUSHIONS WITH FOAM AND SYNTHETIC FIBRES, ALL KIND OF CUSHIONS, EVEN BIG SHAPED SIZES. THE RANGE OF SEWING MACHINE HAS BEEN STUDIED AND BUILT FOLLOWING THE MOST MODERN CONCEPT OF TECHNOLOGY; THEIR COMPONENTS ARE THE MOST ADVANCED AND THE MATERIALS ARE HIGHLY SELECTED: THIS MAKES THE MACHINES STRONG, SAFE, SILENT AND EASY TO BE USED. OPERATIONS FEATURES: THE SPECIAL PLATES (BOTH MOTORIZED) AND THE EXTENDED SEWING BLOCK HELP THE OPERATOR IN THE SEWING OF ANY KIND OF SHAPED CUSHIONS AND DIFFERENT MATERIALS. WITH THE DOUBLE CONVEYING SYSTEM THE MATERIAL IS CONVEYING REGULARLY AND THIS GIVES AN HIGH QUALITY TO THE SEAM AND TO THE PRODUCE, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE PRODUCT IS A “REMOVABLE COVER” SOFA, AND NOT ONLY. VERSATILITY AND PERFORMANCE: KITS AND ACCESSORIES ARE AVAILABLE TO MEET THE MOST DIFFERENT REQUIREMENTS. IT IS POSSIBLE TO SEW (NEVER MIND THE SIZE, THE SHAPE AND THE WEIGHT): - LIGHT COTTON, NONWOVEN, FABRICS COUPLED WITH SYNTHETIC FIBRES, POLYESTER, CARDED AND SIMILAR. - FEATHER PILLOWS - HEAVY MATERIAL SUCH AS CUSHIONS IN SYNTHETIC FIBRES OR DACRON COUPLED WITH FOAM, CUSHIONS WITH SPRINGS ETC. COMPLETE WITH: - EXTENDED SEWING GROUP WITH DOUBLE MOTORIZED TOOTHED PLATES. - SEWING HEAD (OVERLOCK – 1 YARN) STITCH LENGTH: 1 TO 5mm - YARN CUTTING (TRIMMER), CUPS OPENING AND PNEUMATIC OIL PUMP - ELECTRONIC EFKA MOTOR 220V/240V SINGLE PHASE - SPEED: 1900 RPM - PERFORMANCE: 6 SECONDS PER CUSHION (SEWING 15 TO 20 CENTIMETERS) - ELECTRONIC MOBILE FOOTBOARD ALSO INCLUDES 1 SET OF NEEDLES, 1 INSTRUCTION BOOK, 1 CE CONFORMITYPRODUCTIVITY: 10/12 CUSHIONS PER MINUTE (CONSIDERED A OPEN SIDE OF 6/8”) Learn More
- M-5004 PILLOW FILLING MACHINESREFERENCE NUMBER: M-5004 (1212CKWDHH11) L PILLOW FILLING MACHINES DIFFERENT CAPACITIES FOR THIS MACHINE 100KG/H, 120KG/H, 220KG/H, 250KG/H FUNCTION OF THE PILLOW FILLING MACHINE: THE SMALL PIECES OF RAW COTTON OPENING INTO A FLUFFY IMITATION SILK, COTTON, AND USED THE WIND SUCTION OUT FROM OPENING MACHINE, IMITATION SILK COTTON BY METAL DUCT INTO THE CUSHION OR PILLOW. OPERATOR CONTROL THE COTTON FILLING TIME. IT WILL CONNECT WITH THE FIBER OPENING MACHINE THE PRODUCTION LINE INCLUDES FIBER OPENING, CONVEYING, MIXED STIRRING AND STUFFING. IT MIXES AND STIRS MANY KINDS OF STUFFING MATERIALS AND THEN FILLS THEM INTO THROW PILLOWS, CUSHIONS, PILLOWS, PET PRODUCTS, BIG PLUSH TOYS, AND OTHERS. THE OPENING RATE OF THE MACHINE IS UP TO 100%, NO DAMAGES TO FIBER CRIMP AND SLIPPERY. THE STUFFED PRODUCT IS FLUFFY, ELASTIC, AND SOFT. REASONABLE AND EFFICIENT STRUCTURAL CONFIGURATION IMPROVES MANUFACTURING EFFICIENCY, SAVES COT FOR CUSTOMERS, AND DECREASES LABOR INTENSITY. ALL WORK TEETH ARE PROCESSED WITH DYNAMIC BALANCE, NO VIBRATION AND LOW NOISE IN THE OPERATION. THE MACHINE CAN BE FREELY COMBINED BASED ON CUSTOMER’S CHOICE OF AN OPENER AND A FILLING MACHINE, SATISFYING DIFFERENT CUSTOMER’S REQUIREMENTS. CE CERTIFICATION (MODEL: 001) PILLOW FILLING MACHINE CAPACITY: 100KG/H POWER: 6.7KW PRESSURE: 0.4 TO 0.8 MPA VOLTAGE: AS PER CUSTOMER REQUIREMENT NET WEIGHT: 680KG DIMENSION: 3200mm x 1500mm x 1330mm (MODEL: 002) PILLOW FILLING MACHINE CAPACITY: 120KG/H POWER: 6.7KW PRESSURE: 0.4 TO 0.8 MPA VOLTAGE: AS PER CUSTOMER REQUIREMENT NET WEIGHT: 700KG DIMENSION: 3500mm x 1500mm x 1330mm (MODEL: 003) PILLOW FILLING MACHINE CAPACITY: 220KG/H POWER: 10.45KW PRESSURE: 0.4 TO 0.8 MPA VOLTAGE: AS PER CUSTOMER REQUIREMENT NET WEIGHT: 900KG DIMENSION: 4000mm x 2200mm x 1200mm (MODEL: 004) PILLOW FILLING MACHINE CAPACITY: 250KG/H POWER: 10.45KW PRESSURE: 0.4 TO 0.8 MPA VOLTAGE: AS PER CUSTOMER REQUIREMENT NET WEIGHT: 1050KG DIMENSION: 4500mm x 2500mm x 2050mm QUANTITY AVAILABLE: 1 Learn More
- YY-2170 PILLOW AND CUSHION PACKING, PRESSING MACHINES, DIFFERENT MODELSYY-2170 PILLOW AND CUSHION PACKING, PRESSING MACHINES, DIFFERENT MODELS ITEM 001 PILLOW VACUUM PACKING MACHINE QUANTITY: 1 ITEM 002 PILLOW VACUUM PACKING MACHINE (CAN PRESS TWO PILLOWS AT A TIME) QUANTITY: 1 ITEM 003 AUTOMATIC COMPRESS PACKING MACHINE(AIR PRESSURE SYSTEM) WITH FRONT FEED CONVEYOR QUANTITY: 1 ITEM 004 AUTOMATIC PILLOW VACUUM PACKING MACHINE (HYDRAULIC SYSTEM) WITH FRONT AND BACK FEED CONVEYOR QUANTITY: 1 Learn More
- TT-2363 LION AUTOMATIC BLOWER, NOZZLES 2, YEAR 2011TT-2363 LION AUTOMATIC BLOWER, NOZZLES 2, YEAR 2011 QUANTITY: 1 Learn More
- K-6063 AUTOMATIC PILLOW FILLING MACHINE SIEMENS PLCREFERENCE NUMBER: K-6063 AUTOMATIC PILLOW FILLING MACHINE SIEMENS PLC AUTOMATIC PILLOW MACHINE POWER: 23.45 KW CAPACITY: 6-8 PIECES/MIN CONTROL SYSTEM: SIEMENS PLC LABOR: 1 PERSON VOLTAGE: 380V, 50HZ, 3-PHASE FIBER OPENING RATE: 98% UP WEIGHT: 3650KG CONJUGATE HOLLOW SILICONIZED POLYESTER FIBER SHORTER THAN 100mm MICRO FIBER 0.6D-15D QUANTITY AVAILABLE: 1 Learn More
- AA-1166 PILLOW FILLING MACHINE FOR FEATHERS AND DOWN, 2 NOZZLES -FOR FIBER, POLYESTER FIBER, PP COTTON, WOOLAA-1166 PILLOW FILLING MACHINE FOR FEATHERS AND DOWN, 2 NOZZLES -FOR FIBER, POLYESTER FIBER, PP COTTON, WOOL VOLTAGE: 220 VOLTS / 60 Hz AIR PRESSURE: 0.7 TO 0.8 MPa PACKED DIMENSIONS: 1500 x 1180 x 1840mm NET WEIGHT: 360 KGS GROSS WEIGHT: 429 KGS FILLING: FIBER, POLYESTER FIBER, PP COTTON, WOOL Learn More
- G-6925 ELECTRONIC STUFFING MACHINE FOR PILLOWS AND FURNISHING CUSHIONREFERENCE NUMBER: G-6925 ELECTRONIC STUFFING MACHINE FOR PILLOWS AND FURNISHING CUSHION QUANTITY AVAILABLE: 1 Learn More
- K-1289 AUTOMATIC LINE FOR PACKAGING PILLOWS - BY ROBOT INSERTING ADVERTISING SHEET , AUTOMATIC PLACING INTO PLASTIC BAG, FLATTENING OF PLASTIC BAG AND PUSHING INTO A BOXREFERENCE NUMBER: K-1289 AUTOMATIC LINE FOR PACKAGING PILLOWS - BY ROBOT INSERTING ADVERTISING SHEET , AUTOMATIC PLACING INTO PLASTIC BAG, FLATTENING OF PLASTIC BAG AND PUSHING INTO A BOX FOR THE PACKAGING WITH ROBOTIC MACHINES FOR ALL THE MOVEMENTS: CHECKING, FILLING, PRESSING AND WELDING, SCRAPPING THE MATERIAL IN EXCESS, MOTORIZED OUTPUT INTO CARTON BOXES OF PILLOWS OR CUSHIONS. SPECIFIC FOR AUTOMATIC FILLING OF PILLOWS AND CUSHIONS INTO PLASTIC BAGS WITH PRESSING AND WELDING SYSTEM, SCRAPPING THE MATERIAL IN EXCESS AND THE EJECT OF THE BAGGED PILLOWS INTO BOXES, WITHOUT OPERATORS QUANTITY AVAILABLE: 1 Learn More
- D-2388 What’s the Best Material for a Mask?
Federal health officials have now recommended that we cover our faces with fabric during the coronavirus pandemic. But what material offers the most protection?
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has posted a no-sew mask pattern using a bandanna and a coffee filter as well as a video on making masks using rubber bands and folded fabrics found at home.
While a simple face covering can reduce the spread of coronavirus by blocking outgoing germs from coughs or sneezes of an infected person, experts say there is more variation in how much homemade masks might protect the wearer from incoming germs, depending on the fit and quality of the material used.
Scientists around the country have taken it upon themselves to identify everyday materials that do a better job of filtering microscopic particles. In recent tests, HEPA furnace filters scored well, as did vacuum cleaner bags, layers of 600-count pillowcases and fabric similar to flannel pajamas. Stacked coffee filters had medium scores. Scarves and bandanna material had the lowest scores, but still captured a small percentage of particles.
If you don’t have any of the materials that were tested, a simple light test can help you decide whether a fabric is a good candidate for a mask.
“Hold it up to a bright light,” said Dr. Scott Segal, chairman of anesthesiology at Wake Forest Baptist Health who recently studied homemade masks. “If light passes really easily through the fibers and you can almost see the fibers, it’s not a good fabric. If it’s a denser weave of thicker material and light doesn’t pass through it as much, that’s the material you want to use.”
Researchers say it’s important to remember that lab studies are conducted under perfect conditions with no leaks or gaps in the mask, but the test methods give us a way to compare materials. And while the degree of filtration for some homemade masks seems low, most of us — who are staying home and practicing social distancing in public — don’t need the high level of protection required for medical workers. More important, any face covering is better than none, especially if worn by a person who has the virus but doesn’t know it.
The biggest challenge of choosing a homemade mask material is to find a fabric that is dense enough to capture viral particles, but breathable enough that we can actually wear it. Some items being touted online promise high filtration scores, but the material would be unwearable.
Dressing Up for Work … at Home
Yang Wang, an assistant professor of environmental engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology, worked with his graduate students to study various combinations of layered materials — including both air filters and fabric. “You need something that is efficient for removing particles, but you also need to breathe,” said Dr. Wang, who last fall won an international award for aerosol research.To test everyday materials, scientists are using methods similar to those used to test medical masks, which everybody agrees should be saved for medical workers who are exposed to high doses of virus from seeing infected patients. The best medical mask — called the N95 respirator — filters out at least 95 percent of particles as small as 0.3 microns. By comparison, a typical surgical mask — made using a rectangular piece of pleated fabric with elastic ear loops — has a filtration efficiency ranging from 60 to 80 percent.
Dr. Wang’s group tested two types of air filters. An allergy-reduction HVAC filter worked the best, capturing 89 percent of particles with one layer and 94 percent with two layers. A furnace filter captured 75 percent with two layers, but required six layers to achieve 95 percent. To find a filter similar to those tested, look for a minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) rating of 12 or higher or a microparticle performance rating of 1900 or higher.
The problem with air filters is that they potentially could shed small fibers that would be risky to inhale. So if you want to use a filter, you need to sandwich the filter between two layers of cotton fabric. Dr. Wang said one of his grad students made his own mask by following the instructions in the C.D.C. video, but adding several layers of filter material inside a bandanna.
Dr. Wang’s group also found that when certain common fabrics were used, two layers offered far less protection than four layers. A 600 thread count pillow case captured just 22 percent of particles when doubled, but four layers captured nearly 60 percent. A thick woolen yarn scarf filtered 21 percent of particles in two layers, and 48.8 percent in four layers. A 100 percent cotton bandanna did the worst, capturing only 18.2 percent when doubled, and just 19.5 percent in four layers.
The group also tested Brew Rite and Natural Brew basket-style coffee filters, which, when stacked in three layers, showed 40 to 50 percent filtration efficiency — but they were less breathable than other options.
If you are lucky enough to know a quilter, ask them to make you a mask. Tests performed at the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine in Winston-Salem, N.C., showed good results for homemade masks using quilting fabric. Dr. Segal, of Wake Forest Baptist Health, who led the study, noted that quilters tend to use high-quality, high-thread count cotton. The best homemade masks in his study were as good as surgical masks or slightly better, testing in the range of 70 to 79 percent filtration. Homemade masks that used flimsier fabric tested as low as 1 percent filtration, Dr. Segal said.
The best-performing designs were a mask constructed of two layers of high-quality, heavyweight “quilter’s cotton,” a two-layer mask made with thick batik fabric, and a double-layer mask with an inner layer of flannel and outer layer of cotton.
Bonnie Browning, executive show director for the American Quilter’s Society, said that quilters prefer tightly woven cottons and batik fabrics that stand up over time. Ms. Browning said most sewing machines can handle only two layers of fabric when making a pleated mask, but someone who wanted four layers of protection could wear two masks at a time.
Ms. Browning said she recently reached out to quilters on Facebook and heard from 71 people who have made a combined total of nearly 15,000 masks. “We quilters are very much in the thick of what’s going on with this,” said Ms. Browning, who lives in Paducah, Ky. “One thing most of us have is a stash of fabric.”
People who don’t sew could try a folded origami mask, created by Jiangmei Wu, assistant professor of interior design at Indiana University. Ms. Wu, who is known for her breathtaking folded artwork, said she began designing a folded mask out of a medical and building material called Tyvek, as well as vacuum bags, after her brother in Hong Kong, where mask wearing is common, suggested it. (DuPont, the maker of Tyvek, said in a statement that Tyvek is intended for medical apparel, not masks.) The folded mask pattern is free online, as is a video demonstrating the folding process. In tests at Missouri University and University of Virginia, scientists found that vacuum bags removed between 60 percent and 87 percent of particles. But some brands of vacuum bags may contain fiberglass or are harder to breathe through than other materials, and shouldn’t be used. Ms. Wu used a bag by EnviroCare Technologies, which has said it does not use fiberglass in its paper and synthetic cloth bags.
“I wanted to create an alternative for people who don’t sew,” said Ms. Wu, who said she is talking to various groups to find other materials that will be effective in a folded mask. “Given the shortage of all kinds of materials, even vacuum bags might run out.”
The scientists who conducted the tests used a standard of 0.3 microns because that is the measure used by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health for medical masks.
Linsey Marr, a Virginia Tech aerosol scientist and an expert in the transmission of viruses, said the certification method for respirators and HEPA filters focuses on 0.3 microns because particles around that size are the hardest to catch. While it seems counterintuitive, particles smaller than 0.1 microns are actually easier to catch because they have a lot of random motion that makes them bump into the filter fibers, she said.
“Even though coronavirus is around 0.1 microns, it floats around in a wide range of sizes, from around 0.2 to several hundred microns, because people shed the virus in respiratory fluid droplets that also contain lots of salts and proteins and other things,” said Dr. Marr. “Even if the water in the droplets fully evaporates, there’s still a lot of salt and proteins and other gunk that stays behind as solid or gel-like material. I think 0.3 microns is still useful for guidance because the minimum filtration efficiency will be somewhere around this size, and it’s what NIOSH uses.”
Learn More - G-7149 NECK PILLOW FILLING MACHINEREFERENCE NUMBER: G-7149 NECK PILLOW FILLING MACHINE DIMENSIONS: 3300 x 2600 x 1020mm POWER: 10.65kw CAPACITY: 150 TO 180 kg/H WEIGHT: 710kg VOLTAGE: CUSTOMER REQUEST QUANTITY AVAILABLE: 1 Learn More