Search results for: '1"'`--,((('(,",,))',))' or "'[0]'

R-1170 DELL’ ORCO VILLANI RAG TEARING LINE + BALE PRESS, YEAR 1989 TO 1999

DETAILS:
DELL’ ORCA VILLANI RAG TEARING LINE + BALLING MACHINE
COMPOSED BY:
ITEM 001
DELL’ ORCA VILLANI CUTTERS
YEAR: 1989
QUANTITY: 2

ITEM 002
DELL’ ORCA VILLANI MIXING ROOMS + BIN EMPTIER
TYPE: FA/3030/T
QUANTITY: 2

ITEM 003
DELL’ ORCA VILLANI VOLUMATIC FEEDER
MODEL: CARICATORE
TYPE: CS/1600
YEAR: 1999
QUANTITY: 1

ITEM 004
DELL’ ORCA VILLANI RAG TEARING MACHINE
4 CYLINDERS
YEAR: 1999
WIDTH: 1500mm
EACH DRUM MODEL: M/1500
TYPE: SFILACCIATRICE
QUANTITY: 1

ITEM 005
DELL’ ORCA VILLANI VOLUMATIC FEEDER
MODEL: CARICATORE
TYPE: CS/1600
YEAR: 1989
QUANTITY: 1

ITEM 006
DELL’ ORCA VILLANI RAG TEARING MACHINE
3 CYLINDERS
YEAR: 1989
WIDTH: 1500mm
EACH DRUM MODEL: M/1500
TYPE: SFILACCIATRICE
QUANTITY: 1

ITEM 007
DELL’ ORCA VILLANI BALE PRESS
TYPE: RA/100
WITH 2 CHAMBERS (ROTATIVE SYSTEM)
WITH WEIGHING DEVICE (SCALE FOR KG OF EACH BALE)
QUANTITY: 1

ITEM 008
DELL’ ORCA VILLANI DUST COLLECTING INSTALLATION
WITH BAGS TO COLLECT THE DUST
QUANTITY: 1

QUANTITY: 1 LINE

Learn More

REFERENCE NUMBER: T-6989 NONWOVEN FABRIC PRODUCTION PLANTS WITH MALIWATT AND MALIVLIES 3600mm GAUGE 14 AND 7 ITEM 001 PRODUCTION PLANT OF NON-WOVEN FABRIC PLANT IS COMPLETE IN AN EXCELLENT STATE OF MAINTENANCE WITH DRUMS OF 2000mm IN DIAMETER LIKE THE SAME DIAMETER DOFFERS, HIGH WORK 2200mm, 2500 X 4200mm, ALL MACHINES ARE ELECTRONICALLY MANAGED BY PLC, WEIGHT SCALE WITH LOAD CELLS, IT IS THERE IS ALSO THE COMPLETE AUTOMATED FIBER PREPARATION IN ADDITION, THERE IS 1 LOOM FOR NONWOVEN MALIWATT WITH THREAD AND 1 MALIVLIES LOOM WITHOUT SEWING THREAD INTERTWINES THE FIBERS AND PRODUCES A NON-WOVEN FABRIC ALSO USED FOR THE PRODUCTION OF ANTI-COVID-19 FACIAL MASKS FABRIC PRODUCTION PLANTS IN BLOCK FABRIC OR FOR SINGLE UNITS IN GOOD CONDITION AND STILL IN PRODUCTION TODAY THE DESCRIPTION OF THE PLANTS BELOW: ITEM 002 MALIWATT 3600 TYPE 14013 GAUGE 14 YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION 1980 FOR MODEL CARD WORKING HEIGHT 2200mm DRUM DIAMETER 1700mm DOFFER 1270mm, RIGID FRONT GASKET AND 1ST ELASTIC CARD, ORDINARY FINENESS, THE LINE IS COMPOSED OF SILOS, AVAN TRAIN LOADER AND ONE CARD, CROSS LAPPER CORMATEX SAGITTARIO LINE, FIBER USED MIXED POLYESTER AND VISCOSE 70/30% FIBER LENGTH 60mm, 3.4 DTEX, PLANT IN GOOD CONDITION QUANTITY: 2 ITEM 003 MALIWATT 3600 TYPE 14013 GAUGE 7 YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION 1981 CARD MODEL FOR WORKING HEIGHT 2200mm DIAMETERS 1700mm AND DOFFER 1270mm, CONSISTING OF FRONT TRAIN AND A CARD WITH RIGID SEAL AT THE FRONT AND ORDINARY ELASTIC AT THE 1ST CARD. THE LINE CONSISTS OF SILOS, LOADER, FRONT END, CARDER, CROSS LAPPER CORMATEX SAGITTARIO LINE, FIBER USED 70% COTTON AND 30% VISCOSE, PLANT IN GOOD GENERAL CONDITION. QUANTITY: 1 ITEM 004 MALIWATT 3600 TYPE 14013 GAUGE 14 YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION 1981 OCTIR MODEL CARD WORKING HEIGHT 2500mm, RIGID FRONT GASKET AND 1ST ELASTIC CARD, ORDINARY FINENESS, THE LINE IS COMPOSED OF SILOS, AVAN TRAIN LOADER AND ONE CARD, CROSS LAPPER CORMATEX SAGITTARIO LINE, FIBER USED MIXED POLYESTER AND VISCOSE 70/30% LENGTH FIBER 60mm, 3.4 DTEX, IMPLANT IN EXCELLENT CONDITION QUANTITY: 1 ITEM 005 MALIWATT 3600 TYPE 14013 GAUGE 14 YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION 1981 CARD FOR MODEL FOR WORKING HEIGHT 2200mm DIAMETERS 1700mm AND DOFFER 1270mm, CONSISTING OF FRONT TRAIN AND A CARD WITH RIGID SEAL AT THE FRONT AND ORDINARY ELASTIC ON THE 1ST CARD. THE LINE CONSISTS OF SILOS, LOADER, FRONT END, CARDER, CROSS LAPPER CORMATEX SAGITTARIO LINE, FIBER USED 70% COTTON AND 30% VISCOSE, PLANT IN GOOD GENERAL CONDITION. QUANTITY: 1 ITEM 006 MALIWATT 3600 TYPE 14011 GAUGE 14 YEAR OF CONSTRUCTION 1976 BOISSON MODEL CARD WORKING HEIGHT 2000mm, RIGID FRONT GASKET AND 1ST ELASTIC CARD, ORDINARY FINENESS, THE LINE IS COMPOSED OF SILOS, AVAN TRAIN LOADER AND ONE CARD, NENCINI CROSS LAPPER, FIBER USED MIXED POLYESTER AND VISCOSE 70/30% FIBER LENGTH 60mm, 3.4 DTEX, IMPLANT IN FAIR GENERAL CONDITION QUANTITY: 1 DESCRIPTION: ALL PRODUCTION LINES ARE FULLY FUNCTIONAL AND ARE STILL PRODUCTION ALL THE PLANTS ARE COMPOSED OF FORWARD TRAIN AND ONE CARD DOES NOT HAVE FIBER CROSSING AND THE PRODUCTION OF ARTICLES WITH MELANGE COLORS IS PROBLEMATIC, ANOTHER HANDICAP THAT I HAVE DETECTED THE PLANT DOES NOT HAVE FIBER PREPARATION AND STORAGE, THERE ARE BALES AND SILOS OPENERS WITH FEEDING CONVEYORS BUT THE FIBER USED IS NOT WELL MIXED, CURRENTLY THEY PRODUCE NON-WOVEN FABRICS FOR PRINTING. ALL MALIWATTS THE ELECTRICAL SYSTEM AND THE ELECTRONIC BAR HEATING SYSTEM HAVE BEEN REBUILT; THE CROSS LAPPERS HAVE ALSO BEEN UPDATED IN THE ELECTRONICS. THE SELLER SELLS THE PLANT IS NOT PROFITABLE AND THEY PLAN TO REINVEST IN DIFFERENT PRODUCTIONS IN ADDITION, THERE ARE ALSO VARIOUS ACCESSORIES FOR PRODUCTION SUCH AS BALE OPENERS, CALENDERS, CONVEYOR TROLLEYS ETC. Learn More

REFERENCE NUMBER: X-0008 ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED SEMI-AUTOMATIC FILLING FOR PILLOW, CUSHIONS, QUILTS, BABY MATTRESSES AND MORE THIS MACHINE IS A STAND-ALONE AND VERY VERSATILE PILLOW STUFFING AND BAGGING MACHINE. ITS SIMPLE OPERATION ALLOWS TO USE THE SAME EQUIPMENT TO ACCOMPLISH THE TWO PROCESSES: STUFFING A BATT OR A FOAM CORE IN A COVER (OR AN INSERT IN THE FINAL DEC COVER / A PILLOW IN THE FINAL ZIPPERED COVER) AND/OR PUT A FINISHED PILLOW IN A BAG (INDIVIDUAL PE BAG, TWIN-PACK BAG, ZIPPERED VINYL BAG, ETC). THE MACHINE CAN BE LOADED MANUALLY OR WITH A CONVEYOR ON THE REAR PART, WHILE AN OPERATOR IS NEEDED IN THE FRONT: HE PUTS THE COVER/BAG ONTO THE STUFFING BELTS, ACTIVATES THE TENSIONING FORKS WITH THE PEDAL AND HOLDING THE COVER/BAG FACILITATES THE PILLOW STUFFING. POWER SUPPLY IS 400 VOLTS, WILL NEED A TRANSFORMER TO OPERATE ON 480 VOLTS, INQUIRE IF NEEDED Learn More

REFERENCE NUMBER: M-2043 (77034YHEWA6RX) RING SPINNING PLANT YEAR 2000-2002 -17,000 SPINDLES QUANTITY AVAILABLE: 1 Learn More

REFERENCE NUMBER: G-5233 CHICKEN SLAUGHTER LINE 3000 BIRDS PER HOUR QUANTITY AVAILABLE: 1 Learn More

T-7944 HERGETH CARDING MACHINE AND CROSS LAPPER, WIDTH 2500mm, YEAR 1988 ITEM 001 HERGETH CARDING MACHINE PRESENT STATUS: DECOMMISSIONED IN WORKING ORDER QUANTITY: 1 ITEM 002 HERGETH CROSS - LAPPER PRESENT STATUS: DECOMMISSIONED IN WORKING ORDER QUANTITY: 1 Learn More

REFERENCE NUMBER: G-1441 CONVOLUTER MODEL BF WORKING CUTTING WIDTH: 2000mm (78.7") WORKING CUTTING HEIGHT: 20/180mm (7" MAXIMUM) HEIGHT ADJUSTABLE LOADING ROLLER-TABLE: 1000 X 2000mm (39.3" X 78.7") UNLOADING TABLE: 1000 X 2000mm (39.2" X 78.7") MAXIMUM WAVE HEIGHT: 5/80mm (3.14") BLADE BRAKE MOTOR: 4 KW CUTTING SPEED (MOTOR SPEED VARIATOR WITH ADJUSTABLE SPEED BY MEANS OF HAND-WHEEL): 13m/MIN POWER: 5.5 KW TENSION: 400V 50 HZ WEIGHT: 1800 KGS QUANTITY AVAILABLE: 1 Learn More

M-6061 THERMOBONDING LINE, WIDTH 2600mm TO 4000mm, YEAR 1984 TO 1999

OFFER 001
THERMOBONDING LINE
YEAR: 1984 TO 1999
WORKING WIDTH: 2600mm
CAPACITY: 800 KG PER HOUR

OFFER 002
BALE OPENER
YEAR: 1996

OFFER 003
DELL’ORCO & VILLANI MIXING BOX
YEAR: 1996
WIDTH: 4000mm
HEIGHT: 3500mm
LENGTH: 8000mm

OFFER 004
BEMATIC CARDING MACHINE
YEAR: 1984
WORKING WIDTH: 3000mm

OFFER 005
AUTOMATEX CROSSLAPPER
YEAR: 1999

OFFER 006
SICAM OVEN
YEAR: 1996
WORKING WIDTH: 2600mm

OFFER 007
AUTOMATEX CUTTING
YEAR: 1989

QUANTITY: 1 LINE

Learn More

REFERENCE NUMBER: M-3064 (77056HJ6UF) 05B STYROFOAM BALL FILLING MACHINE STYROFOAM BALL FILLING MACHINE MODEL 05B DIMENSION: 3700mm X 1100mm X 2623mm VOLTAGE: 3 PHASE BY ORDER POWER: 2.7 KW CAPACITY: 500 TO 600 KG/H AIR PRESSURE: 0.8 MPA FILLING SLOT: 4 PCS WEIGHT: 510 KG QUANTITY AVAILABLE: 1 Learn More

Federal health officials have now recommended that we cover our faces with fabric during the coronavirus pandemic. But what material offers the most protection?

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has posted a no-sew mask pattern using a bandanna and a coffee filter as well as a video on making masks using rubber bands and folded fabrics found at home.

While a simple face covering can reduce the spread of coronavirus by blocking outgoing germs from coughs or sneezes of an infected person, experts say there is more variation in how much homemade masks might protect the wearer from incoming germs, depending on the fit and quality of the material used.

Scientists around the country have taken it upon themselves to identify everyday materials that do a better job of filtering microscopic particles. In recent tests, HEPA furnace filters scored well, as did vacuum cleaner bags, layers of 600-count pillowcases and fabric similar to flannel pajamas. Stacked coffee filters had medium scores. Scarves and bandanna material had the lowest scores, but still captured a small percentage of particles.

If you don’t have any of the materials that were tested, a simple light test can help you decide whether a fabric is a good candidate for a mask.

“Hold it up to a bright light,” said Dr. Scott Segal, chairman of anesthesiology at Wake Forest Baptist Health who recently studied homemade masks. “If light passes really easily through the fibers and you can almost see the fibers, it’s not a good fabric. If it’s a denser weave of thicker material and light doesn’t pass through it as much, that’s the material you want to use.”

Researchers say it’s important to remember that lab studies are conducted under perfect conditions with no leaks or gaps in the mask, but the test methods give us a way to compare materials. And while the degree of filtration for some homemade masks seems low, most of us — who are staying home and practicing social distancing in public — don’t need the high level of protection required for medical workers. More important, any face covering is better than none, especially if worn by a person who has the virus but doesn’t know it.

The biggest challenge of choosing a homemade mask material is to find a fabric that is dense enough to capture viral particles, but breathable enough that we can actually wear it. Some items being touted online promise high filtration scores, but the material would be unwearable.

Dressing Up for Work … at Home
Yang Wang, an assistant professor of environmental engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology, worked with his graduate students to study various combinations of layered materials — including both air filters and fabric. “You need something that is efficient for removing particles, but you also need to breathe,” said Dr. Wang, who last fall won an international award for aerosol research.

To test everyday materials, scientists are using methods similar to those used to test medical masks, which everybody agrees should be saved for medical workers who are exposed to high doses of virus from seeing infected patients. The best medical mask — called the N95 respirator — filters out at least 95 percent of particles as small as 0.3 microns. By comparison, a typical surgical mask — made using a rectangular piece of pleated fabric with elastic ear loops — has a filtration efficiency ranging from 60 to 80 percent.

Dr. Wang’s group tested two types of air filters. An allergy-reduction HVAC filter worked the best, capturing 89 percent of particles with one layer and 94 percent with two layers. A furnace filter captured 75 percent with two layers, but required six layers to achieve 95 percent. To find a filter similar to those tested, look for a minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) rating of 12 or higher or a microparticle performance rating of 1900 or higher.

The problem with air filters is that they potentially could shed small fibers that would be risky to inhale. So if you want to use a filter, you need to sandwich the filter between two layers of cotton fabric. Dr. Wang said one of his grad students made his own mask by following the instructions in the C.D.C. video, but adding several layers of filter material inside a bandanna.

Dr. Wang’s group also found that when certain common fabrics were used, two layers offered far less protection than four layers. A 600 thread count pillow case captured just 22 percent of particles when doubled, but four layers captured nearly 60 percent. A thick woolen yarn scarf filtered 21 percent of particles in two layers, and 48.8 percent in four layers. A 100 percent cotton bandanna did the worst, capturing only 18.2 percent when doubled, and just 19.5 percent in four layers.

The group also tested Brew Rite and Natural Brew basket-style coffee filters, which, when stacked in three layers, showed 40 to 50 percent filtration efficiency — but they were less breathable than other options.

If you are lucky enough to know a quilter, ask them to make you a mask. Tests performed at the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine in Winston-Salem, N.C., showed good results for homemade masks using quilting fabric. Dr. Segal, of Wake Forest Baptist Health, who led the study, noted that quilters tend to use high-quality, high-thread count cotton. The best homemade masks in his study were as good as surgical masks or slightly better, testing in the range of 70 to 79 percent filtration. Homemade masks that used flimsier fabric tested as low as 1 percent filtration, Dr. Segal said.

The best-performing designs were a mask constructed of two layers of high-quality, heavyweight “quilter’s cotton,” a two-layer mask made with thick batik fabric, and a double-layer mask with an inner layer of flannel and outer layer of cotton.

Bonnie Browning, executive show director for the American Quilter’s Society, said that quilters prefer tightly woven cottons and batik fabrics that stand up over time. Ms. Browning said most sewing machines can handle only two layers of fabric when making a pleated mask, but someone who wanted four layers of protection could wear two masks at a time.

Ms. Browning said she recently reached out to quilters on Facebook and heard from 71 people who have made a combined total of nearly 15,000 masks. “We quilters are very much in the thick of what’s going on with this,” said Ms. Browning, who lives in Paducah, Ky. “One thing most of us have is a stash of fabric.”

People who don’t sew could try a folded origami mask, created by Jiangmei Wu, assistant professor of interior design at Indiana University. Ms. Wu, who is known for her breathtaking folded artwork, said she began designing a folded mask out of a medical and building material called Tyvek, as well as vacuum bags, after her brother in Hong Kong, where mask wearing is common, suggested it. (DuPont, the maker of Tyvek, said in a statement that Tyvek is intended for medical apparel, not masks.) The folded mask pattern is free online, as is a video demonstrating the folding process. In tests at Missouri University and University of Virginia, scientists found that vacuum bags removed between 60 percent and 87 percent of particles. But some brands of vacuum bags may contain fiberglass or are harder to breathe through than other materials, and shouldn’t be used. Ms. Wu used a bag by EnviroCare Technologies, which has said it does not use fiberglass in its paper and synthetic cloth bags.

“I wanted to create an alternative for people who don’t sew,” said Ms. Wu, who said she is talking to various groups to find other materials that will be effective in a folded mask. “Given the shortage of all kinds of materials, even vacuum bags might run out.”

The scientists who conducted the tests used a standard of 0.3 microns because that is the measure used by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health for medical masks.

Linsey Marr, a Virginia Tech aerosol scientist and an expert in the transmission of viruses, said the certification method for respirators and HEPA filters focuses on 0.3 microns because particles around that size are the hardest to catch. While it seems counterintuitive, particles smaller than 0.1 microns are actually easier to catch because they have a lot of random motion that makes them bump into the filter fibers, she said.

“Even though coronavirus is around 0.1 microns, it floats around in a wide range of sizes, from around 0.2 to several hundred microns, because people shed the virus in respiratory fluid droplets that also contain lots of salts and proteins and other things,” said Dr. Marr. “Even if the water in the droplets fully evaporates, there’s still a lot of salt and proteins and other gunk that stays behind as solid or gel-like material. I think 0.3 microns is still useful for guidance because the minimum filtration efficiency will be somewhere around this size, and it’s what NIOSH uses.”

Learn More