Search results for: 'San I pa'
- Related search terms
- sanfori
- santex sa
- santex san
- Sante
- Sant'
-
J-4363 AUTOMATIC PET PAD MAKING MACHINE, 200 PADS PER MINUTEREFERENCE NUMBER: J-4363 AUTOMATIC PET PAD MAKING MACHINE, 200 PADS PER MINUTE FOR PRODUCTS 450 TO 1500mm, COTTON CORE BETWEEN 400 TO 1000mm TOUCH SCREEN WITH ADJUSTABLE PRODUCT REQUIREMENTS IN 450 TO 600mm, COTTON CORE IN 400 TO 550mm PRODUCT STRUCTURE: SURFACE LAYER, BACKING PAPER, COTTON CORE, SAP, BASEMENT MEMBRANE STABLE PRODUCTION SPEED: 120 METERS PER MINUTE IF THE SIZE OF THE FINISHED PRODUCT IS 600 x 600mm, THE MACHINE RUNNING SPEED IS 200 PIECES PER MINUTE (8 HOUR OUTPUT IS 96,000 PIECES) MACHINE DIMENSIONS: 16000 x 2200 x 2600mm (LENGTH x WIDTH x HEIGHT) POWER SUPPLY: 380 VOLTS, 50 Hz TOTAL POWER: ABOUT 80 KW (NOT INCLUDING GLUE) PRESSURE: 1100 LITERS PER MINUTE, 6 TO 8 BARS YIELD: 98% OR GREATER (EXCLUDING ERRORS DUE TO GLUE MACHINE, MATERIAL EXCHANGE AND JOINTS CAUSED BY DEFECTIVE GOODS) QUANTITY: 1 Learn More -
T-7966 SANFORIZER, NOMINAL WIDTH 2200mmT-7966 SANFORIZER, NOMINAL WIDTH 2200mm MACHINE HAND: LEFT OR RIGHT HAND WIDTH: 2200mm SPEED (M/MIN): 5~80M/MIN PRESHRINKAGE: 16%, VARIED FROM VARIETY SHRINKING RATE: ≤1% STEAM PRESSURE OF PRESS ROLLER: 0.5MPA DIAMETER OF DRYING CYLINDER OF FELT FINISH: Φ2000mm FELT: ABOUT 2200G/M2 WATER CONSUMPTION (TON /HR): 1 STEAM CONSUMPTION (KG/HR): 500 TRANSMISSION AND CONTROL: PLC CONTROL, PARAMETERS ON LINE DISPLAY IN COLOR TOUCH SCREEN, MULTI-UNIT AC FREQUENCY CONVERSION DRIVE INSTALLED POWER (KW): 38.45 OVERALL DIMENSION (L X W X H): 12010(L) X 4168(W) X 3925(H)mm QUANTITY: 1 SET Learn More -
A-2572 TUBE FILLING SEALING MACHINE 9.5 KWA-2572 TUBE FILLING SEALING MACHINE 9.5 KW SPECIFICATIONS: SEALING TYPE: HEATING (PLASTIC), FOLDING (ALUMINUM) MAX POWER: 9.5 KW (PLASTIC), 2.3 KW (ALUMINUM) VOLTAGE: 220 VOLTZ AND 50/60 Hz PRODUCTIVITY: 120 TO 150 PCS/Min FILLING VOLUME: 5 TO 250 ML (CHANGE PUMP) TUBE DIAMETER: 10 TO 50 mm (CHANGE MOLDS) TUBE LENGTH: 230 mm (THE MAX.) FILLING ACCURACY: ≤±1% CONTROL: PLC CONTROL SYSTEM DISPLAY: TOUCH SCREEN DISPLAY FEATURE: NO TUBE NO FILLING DIMENSION (L X W X H): 3147 X 1555 X 2267 mm WEIGHT: ABOUT 3800 KG Learn More -
Z-1564 500 L LIQUID WASHING HOMOGENIZER MIXERSZ-1564 500 L LIQUID WASHING HOMOGENIZER MIXERS MAIN STRUCTURE: MIXING POT, ELECTRIC CONTROL SYSTEM, OPERATION PLATFORM ESTIMATED PRODUCTION TIME AND CAPACITY FOR REF • MIXING + HOMOGENIZER + HEATING • REMARK: 2 TO 2.5 HOURS PER BATCH, IF 8 HOURS PER DAY ABOUT 1500 IT’S TO 2000 DAY. • MIXING + HOMOGENIZER • REMARK: 2 HOURS PER BATCH, IF 8 HOURS PER DAY ABOUT 2000 IT’S DAY. • MIXING ONLY • REMARK: 1 TO 1.5 HOURS PER BATCH, IF 8 HOURS DAY, 2500 IT’S TO 4000 DAY. QUANTITY: 1 Learn More -
SUGAR REFINERY COMPLETE LINE 70 TONS PER HOURREFERENCE NUMBER: AJ-2088 SUGAR REFINERY COMPLETE LINE 70 TONS PER HOUR PROCESSING 70 TON PER HOUR OF UNREFINED BROWN SUGAR INTO WHITE CRYSTALLINE. 2007 PUTSCH 1300 X 1300 FILTER PRESSES 2008 AND 2012 BROADBENT CONTINUOUS AND BATCH CENTRIFUGALS BMA AND 1 WIEDMANN VACUUM PAN CRYSTALLIZER SYSTEM 2016 ALFA LAVAL HEAT EXCHANGER OR EVAPORATION SETS 3X ALFA-LAVAL PLATE HEAT EXCHANGERS M10-MFM 105 ℃ STEAM SYRUP 90 T/H 333KW WIDMANN, SHELL AND TUBE HEAT EXCHANGER, MDL. CALANDRIA DN2000 SEPARATOR DN 2400 BMA ROTARY DRYER WITH FLUIDIZED BED COOLER 60 ASSORTED SIZE STAINLESS TANKS AND VESSELS FULL INVENTORY OF NEW SPARE PARTS FOR ALL ABOVE POWER STATION FEATURING 12.5 MW SIEMENS TURBINES VOLUND HIGH-PRESSURE STEAM BOILER (63 TONS AT 60 BAR) 24 JORD AIR COOLING CONDENSER 2014 ATLAS COPCO COMPRESSED AIR SYSTEM AND DRYERS WIDE ASSORTMENT OF ABB SIEMENS SWITCHGEAR 24 UNIT FREE STANDING AIR COOLED CONDENSER SYSTEM PLUSS 100 PROCESS AND VACUUM PUMP INCLUDING NASH, WARMAN, DURCO, PUTSCH, SANDPIPER AND OTHER QUANTITY: 1 Learn More -
RAIN TEST CHAMBER WATER SPRAY SIMULATIONREFERENCE NUMBER: Y-2073 RAIN TEST CHAMBER WATER SPRAY SIMULATION THIS EQUIPMENT IS APPLICABLE TO THE TEST OF RAINPROOF DUST AND SAND SOAKED WATER OF VARIOUS AUTO PARTS, ELECTRONIC APPLIANCES, AND OTHER INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS. AUTO PARTS INCLUDE THE TEST OF FULL SEALING STABILITY OF THE SYSTEM SUCH AS LAMPS, DOOR LOCKS, ELECTRICAL, INSTRUMENTS, DUST COVERS, ELECTRONIC HOUSEHOLD APPLIANCES, ETC. THE TESTED ITEMS ARE INSTALLED OR PLACE IN THE CENTER OF SEMICIRCLE BENDING TUBES AND BOTTOM AND SWING OF THE SPLASHED SAMPLES. THE AXIS IS IN A HORIZONTAL POSITION, AND THE SAMPLES ROTATES AROUND THE CENTERLINE DURING THE TEST. TECHNICAL PARAMETERS: CHAMBER SIZE: 600mm X 600mm X 600mm (WxDxH) DIAMETER OF SPRAY: ⊄0.4mm SPACING OF SPRAY HOLES: 50mm SPRAY PIPE DIAMETER: 16mm NOZZLE ANGLE ADJUSTABLE: 120 (IPX3) 180(IPX4) RADIUS OF SPRAY RING: R 375mm WATER PRESSURE: ADJUSTABLE WATER FLOW AS REQUIRED FLOW: 1 TO 7L PER MINUTE, FLOW SPEED ADJUSTABLE AIR VELOCITY: 10mm PER SECOND TEST TIME: 0 TO 999 MIN ADJUSTABLE SWING ANGLE AMPLITUDE OF SWING TUBE: ±45˙ ± 60˙ ±180˙ PENDULUM TUBE: IT IS DRIVEN BY SERVO MOTOR, WITH HIGH PRECISION AND ACCURATE TIME AND SWING WATER SUPPLY PIPELINE: PPR PIPE IS USED FOR EQUIPMENT WATER SUPPLY, WHICH IS ARRANGE ACCORDING TO BOX DISTRIBUTION AND CONTROLLED BY EQUIPMENT CONTROL SYSTEM CABINET. HEATING MODE: INCORPORATE STAINLESS STEEL HEATING PIPE, SHALLOW WATER PLATE SURFACE EVAPORATION. SPRAY CYCLE: THE SPRAY CYCLE IN THE BOX IS ADJUSTABLE, AND THE DOOR IS EQUIPPED WITH AN OBSERVATION WINDOW TO OBSERVE THE STATE OF THE SAMPLE IN THE BOX. WINDOW WIPED INSTALLED. QUANTITY: 1 Learn More -
D-2388 What’s the Best Material for a Mask?Federal health officials have now recommended that we cover our faces with fabric during the coronavirus pandemic. But what material offers the most protection?
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has posted a no-sew mask pattern using a bandanna and a coffee filter as well as a video on making masks using rubber bands and folded fabrics found at home.
While a simple face covering can reduce the spread of coronavirus by blocking outgoing germs from coughs or sneezes of an infected person, experts say there is more variation in how much homemade masks might protect the wearer from incoming germs, depending on the fit and quality of the material used.
Scientists around the country have taken it upon themselves to identify everyday materials that do a better job of filtering microscopic particles. In recent tests, HEPA furnace filters scored well, as did vacuum cleaner bags, layers of 600-count pillowcases and fabric similar to flannel pajamas. Stacked coffee filters had medium scores. Scarves and bandanna material had the lowest scores, but still captured a small percentage of particles.
If you don’t have any of the materials that were tested, a simple light test can help you decide whether a fabric is a good candidate for a mask.
“Hold it up to a bright light,” said Dr. Scott Segal, chairman of anesthesiology at Wake Forest Baptist Health who recently studied homemade masks. “If light passes really easily through the fibers and you can almost see the fibers, it’s not a good fabric. If it’s a denser weave of thicker material and light doesn’t pass through it as much, that’s the material you want to use.”
Researchers say it’s important to remember that lab studies are conducted under perfect conditions with no leaks or gaps in the mask, but the test methods give us a way to compare materials. And while the degree of filtration for some homemade masks seems low, most of us — who are staying home and practicing social distancing in public — don’t need the high level of protection required for medical workers. More important, any face covering is better than none, especially if worn by a person who has the virus but doesn’t know it.
The biggest challenge of choosing a homemade mask material is to find a fabric that is dense enough to capture viral particles, but breathable enough that we can actually wear it. Some items being touted online promise high filtration scores, but the material would be unwearable.
Dressing Up for Work … at Home
Yang Wang, an assistant professor of environmental engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology, worked with his graduate students to study various combinations of layered materials — including both air filters and fabric. “You need something that is efficient for removing particles, but you also need to breathe,” said Dr. Wang, who last fall won an international award for aerosol research.To test everyday materials, scientists are using methods similar to those used to test medical masks, which everybody agrees should be saved for medical workers who are exposed to high doses of virus from seeing infected patients. The best medical mask — called the N95 respirator — filters out at least 95 percent of particles as small as 0.3 microns. By comparison, a typical surgical mask — made using a rectangular piece of pleated fabric with elastic ear loops — has a filtration efficiency ranging from 60 to 80 percent.
Dr. Wang’s group tested two types of air filters. An allergy-reduction HVAC filter worked the best, capturing 89 percent of particles with one layer and 94 percent with two layers. A furnace filter captured 75 percent with two layers, but required six layers to achieve 95 percent. To find a filter similar to those tested, look for a minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) rating of 12 or higher or a microparticle performance rating of 1900 or higher.
The problem with air filters is that they potentially could shed small fibers that would be risky to inhale. So if you want to use a filter, you need to sandwich the filter between two layers of cotton fabric. Dr. Wang said one of his grad students made his own mask by following the instructions in the C.D.C. video, but adding several layers of filter material inside a bandanna.
Dr. Wang’s group also found that when certain common fabrics were used, two layers offered far less protection than four layers. A 600 thread count pillow case captured just 22 percent of particles when doubled, but four layers captured nearly 60 percent. A thick woolen yarn scarf filtered 21 percent of particles in two layers, and 48.8 percent in four layers. A 100 percent cotton bandanna did the worst, capturing only 18.2 percent when doubled, and just 19.5 percent in four layers.
The group also tested Brew Rite and Natural Brew basket-style coffee filters, which, when stacked in three layers, showed 40 to 50 percent filtration efficiency — but they were less breathable than other options.
If you are lucky enough to know a quilter, ask them to make you a mask. Tests performed at the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine in Winston-Salem, N.C., showed good results for homemade masks using quilting fabric. Dr. Segal, of Wake Forest Baptist Health, who led the study, noted that quilters tend to use high-quality, high-thread count cotton. The best homemade masks in his study were as good as surgical masks or slightly better, testing in the range of 70 to 79 percent filtration. Homemade masks that used flimsier fabric tested as low as 1 percent filtration, Dr. Segal said.
The best-performing designs were a mask constructed of two layers of high-quality, heavyweight “quilter’s cotton,” a two-layer mask made with thick batik fabric, and a double-layer mask with an inner layer of flannel and outer layer of cotton.
Bonnie Browning, executive show director for the American Quilter’s Society, said that quilters prefer tightly woven cottons and batik fabrics that stand up over time. Ms. Browning said most sewing machines can handle only two layers of fabric when making a pleated mask, but someone who wanted four layers of protection could wear two masks at a time.
Ms. Browning said she recently reached out to quilters on Facebook and heard from 71 people who have made a combined total of nearly 15,000 masks. “We quilters are very much in the thick of what’s going on with this,” said Ms. Browning, who lives in Paducah, Ky. “One thing most of us have is a stash of fabric.”
People who don’t sew could try a folded origami mask, created by Jiangmei Wu, assistant professor of interior design at Indiana University. Ms. Wu, who is known for her breathtaking folded artwork, said she began designing a folded mask out of a medical and building material called Tyvek, as well as vacuum bags, after her brother in Hong Kong, where mask wearing is common, suggested it. (DuPont, the maker of Tyvek, said in a statement that Tyvek is intended for medical apparel, not masks.) The folded mask pattern is free online, as is a video demonstrating the folding process. In tests at Missouri University and University of Virginia, scientists found that vacuum bags removed between 60 percent and 87 percent of particles. But some brands of vacuum bags may contain fiberglass or are harder to breathe through than other materials, and shouldn’t be used. Ms. Wu used a bag by EnviroCare Technologies, which has said it does not use fiberglass in its paper and synthetic cloth bags.
“I wanted to create an alternative for people who don’t sew,” said Ms. Wu, who said she is talking to various groups to find other materials that will be effective in a folded mask. “Given the shortage of all kinds of materials, even vacuum bags might run out.”
The scientists who conducted the tests used a standard of 0.3 microns because that is the measure used by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health for medical masks.
Linsey Marr, a Virginia Tech aerosol scientist and an expert in the transmission of viruses, said the certification method for respirators and HEPA filters focuses on 0.3 microns because particles around that size are the hardest to catch. While it seems counterintuitive, particles smaller than 0.1 microns are actually easier to catch because they have a lot of random motion that makes them bump into the filter fibers, she said.
“Even though coronavirus is around 0.1 microns, it floats around in a wide range of sizes, from around 0.2 to several hundred microns, because people shed the virus in respiratory fluid droplets that also contain lots of salts and proteins and other things,” said Dr. Marr. “Even if the water in the droplets fully evaporates, there’s still a lot of salt and proteins and other gunk that stays behind as solid or gel-like material. I think 0.3 microns is still useful for guidance because the minimum filtration efficiency will be somewhere around this size, and it’s what NIOSH uses.”
Learn More -
R-8929 SANGIACOMO FANTASIAL C LINTOE F6, CYLINDER 3 3/4", NEEDLES 156, GAUGE 36, YEAR 2001REFERENCE NUMBER: R-8929
Learn More
FANTASIAL C LINTOE F6
YEAR: 2001
QUANTITY: 5 -
R-8928 SANGIACOMO FANTASIAL C LINTOE F6, CYLINDER 3 3/4", NEEDLES 160, GAUGE 36, YEAR 2001REFERENCE NUMBER: R-8928
Learn More
FANTASIAL C LINTOE F6
YEAR: 2001
QUANTITY: 8 -
R-8927 SANGIACOMO FANTASIAL C LINTOE F6, CYLINDER 3 3/4", NEEDLES 156, GAUGE 36, YEAR 2007REFERENCE NUMBER: R-8927
Learn More
FANTASIAL C LINTOE F6
YEAR: 2007
QUANTITY: 5