Search results for: 'Machine+fla'

TT-6597 MTU OPEN TYPE NATURAL GAS GENERATORS, 1.5 MW, 50Hz EXCELLENT FULL DESCRIPTION OF A GENERATOR QUANTITY: 10 Learn More

INVENTORY NUMBER: E-9384 HORIZONTAL AUTOMATIC CONTINUOUS FOAMING LINE OVEN LENGTH: 16.9 M. FOAMING HEIGHT: 1.0 TO 1.3 M. FOAMING WIDTH: 1.15 TO 2.3 M. FOAMING DENSITY: 10 TO 50KG/M3. CONVEYOR BELT LENGTH: 16.9 M. SIDE BOARD WIDTH ADJUSTMENT: 0.98 TO 2.4M. CONVEYOR BELT SPEED: 2.0 TO 7.0M/MIN. MIXING-HEAD POWER: 37KW. WITH BLOCK CUTTING MACHINE. TOTAL POWER: 130KW. TOTAL OUTPUT: 200 TO 350KG/MIN. MACHINE EXTERNAL SIZE: L34000 X W4550 X H4200mm. CE CERTIFICATE GUARANTEE FOR ONE YEAR. QUANTITY AVAILABLE: 1 Learn More

TT-7680 SIEMENS SST 400 CONDENSING STEAM TURBINE, YEAR 2011, 50/60Hz, 30 MW SIEMENS SST 400 YEAR 2011 TYPE: SST 400 CONDENSING STEAM TURBINE WITH FOUR BLEEDS AND ONE EXTRACTION TURBOSE OUTPUT: (AT GENERATOR TERMINALS) NORMAL 30 MW MAXIMAL 31.88 MW MINIMAL 4.5 MW QUANTITY: 4 Learn More

LIST NUMBER: L-2987
SIZING MACHINES FOR SALE

REFERENCE NUMBER: P-6749
ROTAL
SIZING MACHINE
YEAR: 1990
QUANTITY: 1

REFERENCE NUMBER: P-7175
BENNINGER ZELL
SIZING
YEAR: 1994
HEAD STOCK WORKING WIDTH: 2800mm
QUANTITY: 1

REFERENCE NUMBER: P-5168
SUCKER
MODEL: MOENUS Z 14
SIZZING MACHINE
WIDTH: 3400mm

BENNINGER
TYPE: BEN DIRECT
WARPER
QUANTITY: 1

REFERENCE NUMBER: P-5818
SUCKER MULLER
SIZING 2 SIZING BOX WIH BENNINGER DIRECT WARPER
YEAR: 1989
WIDTH: 130 INCHES
QUANTITY: 1

REFERENCE NUMBER: P-5586
BENNINGER-ZELL
WARP SIZING LINE
YEAR: 1994
WORKING WIDTH: 3400mm
QUANTITY: 1

REFERENCE NUMBER: C-1229
SUCKER MULLER SIZING MACHINE
MODEL ZG6
YEAR 1984
WORK WIDTH 3000mm
SCHLAFHORST DIRECT WARPING MACHINE MODEL MZD
YEAR 1984
WORK WIDTH 1600mm
QUANTITY: 1

REFERENCE NUMBER: R-1913
SUCKER SIZING
WORKING WIDTH: 3300mm
QUANTITY: 1

REFERENCE NUMBER: R-3193
BENNINGER SIZING MACHINE
TYPE: BEN-SIZE TEC A13
YEAR: 1994
HEADSTOCK WIDTH: 3400mm
QUANTITY: 1

REFERENCE NUMBER: P-3562
WEST POINT
MODEL: 861
SLASHER
YEAR: 1993
HEADWAY WIDTH: 126 INCHES
QUANTITY: 1

Learn More

REFERENCE NUMBER: M-4690 (11111B176Y10UF) L FULL AUTOMATIC SINGLE HEAD CHOCOLATE PRODUCTION LINE TOTAL ELECTRIC POWER: 21KW AIR COMPRESSOR: CONSUMPTION: 0.22M3/MIN, PRESSURE: 0.7MPA WORKING CNDITION: TEMPERATURE: 20 TO 25°C CHOCOLATE WEIGHT: PURE CHOCOLATE: 2.5 TO 512 G, CENTRE FILLED CHOCOLATE: 15 TO 40G TOTAL MACHINE WEIGHT: 5,250KGS TOTAL MACHINE SIZE: 16.7 x 1.21 x 2.5 M MOULD SIZE: 280 x 200 x 30mm AND 300 x 225 x 30mm THE FOOD CONTACT SPARE PARTS ARE ALL PLATED WITH NICKEL. DOUGH HOPPER INSIDE SURFACE IS MADE OF STAINLESS STEEL 304, BEAUTIFUL AND CLEAN. TO MEET THE STANDARD OF FOOD STANDARD. COCOA BUTTER MELTING TANK (1SET) SUGAR GRINDING MACHINE (1SET) 500L CHOCOLATE CONCH (REFINER) (2SET) 500L CHOCOLATE HOLDING TANK (2SET) QH320 CHOCOLATE SYRUP PUMP (2SET) QH25CHOCOLATE SYRUP PUMP (2SET) QH-I SINGLE HEAD CHOCOLATE DEPOSITING AND COOLING TUNNEL (1SET) CHOCOLATE MOULDS (280PCS) CONTROL PANEL BOX (1PCS) OTHER OPTIONAL EQUIPMENTS: (CHOOSE WHEN USE NATURAL COCOA BUTTER) 250KG CHOCOLATE TEMPERING MACHINE 1SET QUANTITY AVAILABLE: 1 Learn More

LIST NUMBER: L-3004
SIZING MACHINES FOR SALE

REFERENCE NUMBER: C-5212
BENNINGER SIZING MACHINE
TYPE BEN SIZETEC
YOM: 2004
WORKING WIDTH: 2400mm
BENINGER DIRECT WARPER
TYPE BEN DIRECT
YOM: 2005
WORKING WIDTH: 2400mm
QUANTITY: 1

REFERENCE NUMBER: P-4682
BENNINGER
SIZING MACHINE
YEAR: 2002
WIDTH: 2800mm
QUANTITY: 1 SET

REFERENCE NUMBER: P-7130
SUCKER MULLER
TYPE: HACOBA
SIZING MACHINE
YEAR: 1999
WORKING WIDTH: 1800mm
QUANTITY: 1

REFERENCE NUMBER: C-3650
OFFER 001
SUCKER MOENUS Z 14 SIZING MACHINE
WIDTH: 3400mm
YEAR: 2006
QUANTITY: 1
OFFER 002
BENNINGER BEN DIRECT WARPING MACHINE
YEAR: 2005
WIDTH: 2200mm
QUANTITY: 1

REFERENCE NUMBER: A-1197 (1212GHBXX11) A
MAKE: BENNINGER
MODEL: BEN SIZETEC
YEAR: 1998
Width - 2000mm
QUANTITY: 2

REFERENCE NUMBER: P-6712
SUCKER MULLER
SIZING MACHINE
YEAR: 2003
HEADSTOCK WIDTH: 3600mm
QUANTITY: 1

REFERENCE NUMBER: M-5040
(1 SET) BENNINGER SIZING MACHINES (SLASHERS), YEAR 2000

REFERENCE NUMBER: R-3746
ITEM 001
KARL MAYER​ DIRECT WARPING ​MACHINE
YEAR: 20​06​
WIDTH: 2​0​00mm
​QUANTITY: 1 SET
ITEM 002
KARL MAYER SIZING MACHINE
YEAR: 2011
QUANTITY: 1 SET

Learn More

REFERENCE NUMBER: R-1390
OSTHOFF SINGEING/CORINO ENTRY & EXIT/PAREX & DESIZING RANGE, WORKING WIDTH 2000mm, YEAR 1995 - RECONDITIONED 2015
DETAILS:
BRAND:OSTHOFF
WORKING WIDTH: 2000mm
YEAR: 1995
FULLY RECONDITIONED IN YEAR: 2015

COMPRISING OF:

ITEM 001
CORINO DE- BATCH- J BOX & BRUSH
WORKING WIDTH: 2000mm
QUANTITY: 1

ITEM 002
OSTHOFF SINGEING MACHINE
TYPE: PK 90
MAXIMUM FABRIC WIDTH: 2000mm
MAXIMUM FLAME WIDTH: 2200mm
QUANTITY: 1

ITEM 003
GAS BURNERS WITH AUTO IGNITION ELECTRODES
WORKING WIDTH: 2000mm
QUANTITY: 2

ITEM 004
PAREX DESIZING WITH 2 BOWL PADDER
QUANTITY: 1

ITEM 005
ONE PAREX OPEN WIDTH DESIZING - WASHING TANK
WORKING WIDTH: 2000mm
QUANTITY: 1

Learn More

J-4564 5 KILO SAMPLE SOFT FLOW MACHINE CAPACITY 5 TO 10 KILO MATERIAL CONSTRUCTION [HTHP-VESSEL] 316 L 5 mm THICKNESS PUMP SS 316 – MOTOR HP 3 HP – 1500 RPM DIAMETER OF VESSEL 1150 mm TOTAL LENTGH 2200 mm TOTAL WIDTH 3900 mm MAXIMUM WORKING HIGH TEMP. 135° C MAXIMUM WORKING PRESSURE 3 KG/ cm2 TUBE 1 TUBE SIZE DIAMETER 200 mm NOZZLE SIZE [OVERFLOW FIX ] DIAMETER 190 mm X 168 mm INSIDE WINCH (HP) 1 HP X 1 FOR FULLY AUTO COLOR TANK INJECTION PUMP 1 HP/3000 RPM UNLOADING WINCH 1 HP /200RPM GEAR BOX COLOR TANK (LITERS) 20 LITERS X 2 PIECES FILL (AUTO) DIAMETER 1.5” X 2 DRAIN [ AUTO] DIAMETER 1.5 ” X 2 OVER FLOW [AUTO] DIAMETER 1.5” X 1 HEAT [ AUTO] DIAMETER 1” COOL [ AUTO] DIAMETER 1” LIQUOR RATIO 1: 5 TO 1 : 7 [ DEPEND ON FABRIC] QUANTITY: 1 Learn More

Federal health officials have now recommended that we cover our faces with fabric during the coronavirus pandemic. But what material offers the most protection?

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has posted a no-sew mask pattern using a bandanna and a coffee filter as well as a video on making masks using rubber bands and folded fabrics found at home.

While a simple face covering can reduce the spread of coronavirus by blocking outgoing germs from coughs or sneezes of an infected person, experts say there is more variation in how much homemade masks might protect the wearer from incoming germs, depending on the fit and quality of the material used.

Scientists around the country have taken it upon themselves to identify everyday materials that do a better job of filtering microscopic particles. In recent tests, HEPA furnace filters scored well, as did vacuum cleaner bags, layers of 600-count pillowcases and fabric similar to flannel pajamas. Stacked coffee filters had medium scores. Scarves and bandanna material had the lowest scores, but still captured a small percentage of particles.

If you don’t have any of the materials that were tested, a simple light test can help you decide whether a fabric is a good candidate for a mask.

“Hold it up to a bright light,” said Dr. Scott Segal, chairman of anesthesiology at Wake Forest Baptist Health who recently studied homemade masks. “If light passes really easily through the fibers and you can almost see the fibers, it’s not a good fabric. If it’s a denser weave of thicker material and light doesn’t pass through it as much, that’s the material you want to use.”

Researchers say it’s important to remember that lab studies are conducted under perfect conditions with no leaks or gaps in the mask, but the test methods give us a way to compare materials. And while the degree of filtration for some homemade masks seems low, most of us — who are staying home and practicing social distancing in public — don’t need the high level of protection required for medical workers. More important, any face covering is better than none, especially if worn by a person who has the virus but doesn’t know it.

The biggest challenge of choosing a homemade mask material is to find a fabric that is dense enough to capture viral particles, but breathable enough that we can actually wear it. Some items being touted online promise high filtration scores, but the material would be unwearable.

Dressing Up for Work … at Home
Yang Wang, an assistant professor of environmental engineering at Missouri University of Science and Technology, worked with his graduate students to study various combinations of layered materials — including both air filters and fabric. “You need something that is efficient for removing particles, but you also need to breathe,” said Dr. Wang, who last fall won an international award for aerosol research.

To test everyday materials, scientists are using methods similar to those used to test medical masks, which everybody agrees should be saved for medical workers who are exposed to high doses of virus from seeing infected patients. The best medical mask — called the N95 respirator — filters out at least 95 percent of particles as small as 0.3 microns. By comparison, a typical surgical mask — made using a rectangular piece of pleated fabric with elastic ear loops — has a filtration efficiency ranging from 60 to 80 percent.

Dr. Wang’s group tested two types of air filters. An allergy-reduction HVAC filter worked the best, capturing 89 percent of particles with one layer and 94 percent with two layers. A furnace filter captured 75 percent with two layers, but required six layers to achieve 95 percent. To find a filter similar to those tested, look for a minimum efficiency reporting value (MERV) rating of 12 or higher or a microparticle performance rating of 1900 or higher.

The problem with air filters is that they potentially could shed small fibers that would be risky to inhale. So if you want to use a filter, you need to sandwich the filter between two layers of cotton fabric. Dr. Wang said one of his grad students made his own mask by following the instructions in the C.D.C. video, but adding several layers of filter material inside a bandanna.

Dr. Wang’s group also found that when certain common fabrics were used, two layers offered far less protection than four layers. A 600 thread count pillow case captured just 22 percent of particles when doubled, but four layers captured nearly 60 percent. A thick woolen yarn scarf filtered 21 percent of particles in two layers, and 48.8 percent in four layers. A 100 percent cotton bandanna did the worst, capturing only 18.2 percent when doubled, and just 19.5 percent in four layers.

The group also tested Brew Rite and Natural Brew basket-style coffee filters, which, when stacked in three layers, showed 40 to 50 percent filtration efficiency — but they were less breathable than other options.

If you are lucky enough to know a quilter, ask them to make you a mask. Tests performed at the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine in Winston-Salem, N.C., showed good results for homemade masks using quilting fabric. Dr. Segal, of Wake Forest Baptist Health, who led the study, noted that quilters tend to use high-quality, high-thread count cotton. The best homemade masks in his study were as good as surgical masks or slightly better, testing in the range of 70 to 79 percent filtration. Homemade masks that used flimsier fabric tested as low as 1 percent filtration, Dr. Segal said.

The best-performing designs were a mask constructed of two layers of high-quality, heavyweight “quilter’s cotton,” a two-layer mask made with thick batik fabric, and a double-layer mask with an inner layer of flannel and outer layer of cotton.

Bonnie Browning, executive show director for the American Quilter’s Society, said that quilters prefer tightly woven cottons and batik fabrics that stand up over time. Ms. Browning said most sewing machines can handle only two layers of fabric when making a pleated mask, but someone who wanted four layers of protection could wear two masks at a time.

Ms. Browning said she recently reached out to quilters on Facebook and heard from 71 people who have made a combined total of nearly 15,000 masks. “We quilters are very much in the thick of what’s going on with this,” said Ms. Browning, who lives in Paducah, Ky. “One thing most of us have is a stash of fabric.”

People who don’t sew could try a folded origami mask, created by Jiangmei Wu, assistant professor of interior design at Indiana University. Ms. Wu, who is known for her breathtaking folded artwork, said she began designing a folded mask out of a medical and building material called Tyvek, as well as vacuum bags, after her brother in Hong Kong, where mask wearing is common, suggested it. (DuPont, the maker of Tyvek, said in a statement that Tyvek is intended for medical apparel, not masks.) The folded mask pattern is free online, as is a video demonstrating the folding process. In tests at Missouri University and University of Virginia, scientists found that vacuum bags removed between 60 percent and 87 percent of particles. But some brands of vacuum bags may contain fiberglass or are harder to breathe through than other materials, and shouldn’t be used. Ms. Wu used a bag by EnviroCare Technologies, which has said it does not use fiberglass in its paper and synthetic cloth bags.

“I wanted to create an alternative for people who don’t sew,” said Ms. Wu, who said she is talking to various groups to find other materials that will be effective in a folded mask. “Given the shortage of all kinds of materials, even vacuum bags might run out.”

The scientists who conducted the tests used a standard of 0.3 microns because that is the measure used by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health for medical masks.

Linsey Marr, a Virginia Tech aerosol scientist and an expert in the transmission of viruses, said the certification method for respirators and HEPA filters focuses on 0.3 microns because particles around that size are the hardest to catch. While it seems counterintuitive, particles smaller than 0.1 microns are actually easier to catch because they have a lot of random motion that makes them bump into the filter fibers, she said.

“Even though coronavirus is around 0.1 microns, it floats around in a wide range of sizes, from around 0.2 to several hundred microns, because people shed the virus in respiratory fluid droplets that also contain lots of salts and proteins and other things,” said Dr. Marr. “Even if the water in the droplets fully evaporates, there’s still a lot of salt and proteins and other gunk that stays behind as solid or gel-like material. I think 0.3 microns is still useful for guidance because the minimum filtration efficiency will be somewhere around this size, and it’s what NIOSH uses.”

Learn More

REFERENCE NUMBER: M-5158 (1212CVPGXX11) L COMPLETE TERRY WEAVING PLANT 1 WEST POINT DIRECT WARPER WORKING WIDTH 1.8M, FLANGE DIAMETER BEAM OUTPUT 940 MM, PRESSURE ROLLER 1 WEST POINT V-CREEL, 504 ENDS, 504 SPARE ENDS, PITCH 400 MM, WP ELECTRO SENSE 1 WEST POINT DIRECT WARPER, WORKING WIDTH 1.8M, FLANGE DIAMETER BEAM OUTPUT 940 MM, PRESSURE ROLLER 1 WEST POINT V-CREEL, 640 ENDS, 640 SPARE ENDS, PITCH 450 MM, WP ELECTRO SENSE 1 WEST POINT SIZING UNIT, 10 POSITION CREEL, WORKING WIDTH 1.8M, DIAMETER 940 MM SINGLE SIZE BOX, ROLLER WIDTH 1.8 M, SINGLE SQUEEZING 10 DRYING CYLINDERS, TEFLON COATED, PARRAFIN WEST POINT HEAD STOCK, WORKING WIDTH 2.7 M, FLANGE 1250 MM 1 WEST POINT SIZING UNIT, 10 POSITION CREEL, WORKING WIDTH 1.8M, DIAMETER 940 MM SINGLE SIZE BOX, ROLLER WIDTH 1.8 M, SINGLE SQUEEZING 8 DRYING CYLINDERS, 7 TEFLON COATED, PARRAFIN WEST POINT HEAD STOCK, WORKING WIDTH 3.0 M, FLANGE 1250 MM 1 WEST POINT SIZING UNIT, 8 POSITION CREEL, WORKING WIDTH 1.8M, DIAMETER 940 MM SINGLE SIZE BOX, ROLLER WIDTH 1.8 M, SINGLE SQUEEZING 7 DRYING CYLINDERS, 6 TEFLON COATED, PARRAFIN WEST POINT HEAD STOCK, WORKING WIDTH 2.7 M, FLANGE 1250 MM 1 SIZE KITCHEN , 5 STAINLESS STEEL MIXING TANKS WITH HEATING 7 MOTOCONO REMAIN WINDERS, 4 POSITIONS EACH 1 WARP BEAM STORAGE, 6 ROWS, 4 LEVELS, 14 M LENGTH 3 SHELVES SINGLE SIDED, 2 SHELVES DOUBLE SIDED WITH HUBTEX WARP BEAM LIFTER, MODEL 20TS 62 SULZER TERRY PROJECTILE LOOMS WITH JACQUARD (8) MODEL P7100 B330 F4 EP J D1, YEAR 4X 1989, 2X 1990, 2X 1991 WORKING WIDTH 3,3 M / 130” (7) STAUBLI E-JACQUARD CX-870, YEAR 1998-2004, 2688 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-5 (1) STAUBLI E-JACQUARD CX-860, YEAR 1997, 2688 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-4 (M/C 1989) GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940 MM DIAMETER (2) MODEL P7200 B330 F4 J Q D1, YEAR 1X 1991, 1X 1995 WORKING WIDTH 3,3 M / 130” STAUBLI E-JACQUARD CX-870, YEAR 2004, 2688 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-5 GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940/1250 MM DIAMETER (6) MODEL P7100 B330 F4 J D1, YEAR 1X 1991, 1X 1992, 4X 1994 WORKING WIDTH 3,3 M / 130” (4) STAUBLI E-JACQUARD CX-860, YEAR 1994, 2688 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-4 (2) STAUBLI E-JACQUARD CX-870, YEAR 2004, 2688 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-5 (M/C 1990/91) GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940 MM DIAMETER (4) MODEL P7250 B330 F4 J D1, YEAR 2X 2000, 2X 2001 WORKING WIDTH 3,3 M / 130” STAUBLI E-JACQUARD CX-870, YEAR 2X 2001, 2X 2004, 2688 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-5 GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940/1250 MM DIAMETER (5) MODEL P7100 B390 F4 EP J D1, YEAR 1X 1991, 1X 1992, 2X 1994, 1X 1995 WORKING WIDTH 3,9 M / 153” STAUBLI E-JACQUARD CX-870, YEAR 2003/2004, 2688 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-5 GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940 MM DIAMETER (1) MODEL P7100 B390 F4 EP J D1, YEAR 1992 WORKING WIDTH 3,9 M / 153” SCHLEICHER MECHANICAL JACQUARD 3-08, YEAR 1990, 896 HOOKS CAM MOTION, 6 LEVERS INSTALLED, 4 FRAMES GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940 MM DIAMETER (4) MODEL P7100 B390 F4 EP J D1, YEAR 1X 1992, 3X 1994 WORKING WIDTH 3,9 M / 153” STAUBLI E-JACQUARD LX-1602, YEAR 2006/2008, 3072 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-6 GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940 MM DIAMETER (6) MODEL P7100 B390 F4 EP J D1, YEAR 1X 1992, 4X 1993, 1X 1994 WORKING WIDTH 3,9 M / 153” STAUBLI MECHANICAL JACQUARD CR-520S, YEAR 1993/94, 1344 HOOKS GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940 MM DIAMETER (1) MODEL P7100 B390 F4 EP J D1, YEAR 1994, WORKING WIDTH 3,9 M / 153” STAUBLI MECHANICAL JACQUARD CR-520, YEAR 1995, 1344 HOOKS GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940 MM DIAMETER (2) MODEL P7100 B390 F4 EP J D1, YEAR 1995, WORKING WIDTH 3,9 M / 153” STAUBLI E-JACQUARD LX-1600, YEAR 2006, 3072 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-5 GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940 MM DIAMETER (4) MODEL P7100 B390 F4 J D1, YEAR 1995 , WORKING WIDTH 3,9 M / 153” STAUBLI E-JACQUARD CX-860, YEAR 1996, 2688 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-4 GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940 MM DIAMETER (1) MODEL P7100 B390 F4 J D2, YEAR 1995 , WORKING WIDTH 3,9 M / 153” STAUBLI E-JACQUARD CX-960, YEAR 1996, 3072 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-4 GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940 MM DIAMETER (8) MODEL P7200 B390 F4 J Q D1, YEAR 6X 1996, 2X 1997, WORKING WIDTH 3,9 M / 153” STAUBLI E-JACQUARD CX-870, YEAR 1998, 2688 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-5 GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940/1250 MM DIAMETER (8) MODEL P7250 B390 F4 J D1, YEAR 6X 1997, 2X 1998 , WORKING WIDTH 3,9 M / 153” (4) STAUBLI E-JACQUARD LX-1600, YEAR 2000, 3072 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-5 (M/C 1997) (4) STAUBLI E-JACQUARD CX-870, YEAR 2000/01, 2688 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-5 (M/C 1997/98) GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940/1250 MM DIAMETER (1) MODEL P7250 B390 F4 J D2, YEAR 1999 , WORKING WIDTH 3,9 M / 153” STAUBLI E-JACQUARD LX-1600, YEAR 2002, 3072 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-5 GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940/1250 MM DIAMETER (1) MODEL P7250 B390 F4 J D3, YEAR 1999, WORKING WIDTH 3,9 M / 153” STAUBLI E-JACQUARD LX-1600, YEAR 2002, 3072 HOOKS, CONTROLLER JC-5 GROUND AND PILE WARP BEAM 940/1250 MM DIAMETER ALL MACHINES WITH 4 COLORS, AVERAGE 3 WEFT FEEDERS (ROH CHRONO HS AND SIMILAR), MIN. 3 CENTRAL TUCK IN UNITS PER MACHINE, SIDE TUCK IN UNITS, USTER LOOM DATA E-JACQUARD M/C WITH ELECTRONICALLY CONTROLLED COLOR SELECTION (EXCEPT 8 MECHANICAL M/CS) SPLIT BEAM EXECUTION, 1.5 PILE BEAMS, 1.5 GROUND BEAMS ON-LOOM TAKE-UP, 1.5 CLOTH ROLLS, 4 WEFT FEEDERS, 4 DROP WIRE BARS APPROX. 9000 DROP WIRES AND 4500 HEDDLES, LOOMDATA APPROX. 80% PLATINES INSTALLED STARTES OR STAUBLI HARNESS, ONE LIETTY GANTRY FOR TWO MACHINES LOOM POWER 5 OR 6 KW, JACQUARD POWER 2 KW 5 TONELLO AT GARMENT WASHING AND BLEACHING MACHINES MODEL G510, YEAR: 1 X 2002, 2 X 2003, 1 X 2004, 1 X 2007, TEMPERATURE 98C , CAPACITY 500 KG.EACH, TONELLO CONTROLS DIRECT STEAM OPERATED, CURRENTLY ALL ARE CONNECTED TO A CENTRAL DOSING SYSTEM (BUT EACH HAS ITS OWN DOSING SYSTEM AND CAN WORK AS INDEPENDENT M/C) FULL DRUM (NOT DIVIDED), 4 WATER ENTRIES AND 2 DRAINING OPENINGS CAPABLE OF WASHING, BLEACHING AND WATER EXTRACTION, HEAVY DUTY (SUITABLE FOR JEANS) 1 TONELLO AT GARMENT WASHING AND BLEACHING MACHINES MODEL G1 50 HS, YEAR 2007, TEMPERATURE 98°C, CAPACITY 50 KG. TONELLO CONTROLS, DIRECT STEAM OPERATED, AIR PRESSURE 7 BAR, HYDRAULICS 3 BAR, STEAM 10 BAR, FULL DRUM (NOT DIVIDED), 4 WATER ENTRIES AND 2 DRAINING OPENINGS CAPABLE OF WASHING, BLEACHING AND WATER EXTRACTION, HEAVY DUTY (SUITABLE FOR JEANS) 2 TRIVENETA GARMENT DRYERS, TYPE E550 PV YEAR 2001 MODEL 550 P CAPACITY 500 KG. EACH, DRYING CYCLE TIME IS HALF OF THE TONELLO = EACH MACHINE CAN SERVE 2 TONELLO MACHINES - SEMI AUTOMATIC LOADING AND DISCHARGING, STEAM OPERATED ITEMIZED SALE IS POSSIBLE – AGAINST OFFERS AVAILABLE IMMEDIATELY – STOPPED ON MILL FLOOR Learn More